the three 'selfs'

I've been reading a lot about cross-cultural relationships and service
recently. One of the new watchwords for any overseas mission are the
three 'selfs': self-governing, self-sustaining, and self-propagating.
These principles I think came about as an attempt to learn from previous
mistakes (yes, it can actually happen!) of neo-colonialism and
superiority complexes often brought in the past (and still brought some
by visitors, aid relief, and so forth) with devastating consequences.
Despite how things turned out, no one had a vision to come to Africa and
create dependency, unsustainable solutions, and destroy the local fabric
of society. I think these three 'selfs' provide important safeguards to
ensure that those models of developmental change don't happen again.
I can't help but remain uncomfortable with the three 'self' model,
however, on some fundamental levels. One comes from the nationals
themselves, some of whom have viewed this movement as an abandonment
that they neither asked for or particularly wanted. Is a forced
abandonment such a good thing? On many levels, it ignores the reality
of the economy of poverty in many of the places where these ministries
work. When a family subsists on 1-2 dollars/day, it is ludicrous to
expect any ministry to that area to ever be 'self-sustaining' without
significant economic and infrastructural changes occurring first. This
simple fact is obvious to the nationals who live and work in these
areas, but in an emphasis on 'self-sustaining' and 'self-propagating'
these concerns are swept aside. Jeffrey Sachs makes the point that
poverty has a threshold below which all interventions eventually lead to
nought because they lack the necessary impetus to grow. If that
threshold level has not been reached, a premature transition to
self-sufficiency will result in the ultimate destruction of the services
and ministry in the area. One could ask that very question of the
hospital where I work -- in the rural areas in our province there is
currently ONE Zambian doctor working in the whole province (at our
hospital already, I might add). Most of our patients total income for
the year will likely be between 200-300,000K (around 90-100 USD). Is
that a situation where the local populace can be expected to support a
hospital?
Although perhaps well-intentioned, I feel that the three-self principles
are an attempt to provide a somewhat easy solution to what is a
difficult problem, requiring humility and sensitivity -- how to be
willing to put yourself at the disposal of your Zambian/national
colleagues and trusting them to spend you wisely. How risky is that --
to open your own resources, money, time, professional gifts, and let
someone else in the community decide how they will be spent instead of
you deciding yourself? Such a concept is almost anathema to someone
from the individualistic cultures of the West where donations should be
ear-marked, reported on, and tightly controlled even after the money has
been given. Such a concept leaves you vulnerable to the people from the
other culture perhaps using more of your resources than you intended
them to, or spending them on different priorities, or even perhaps
'wasting' them, at least from your perspective.
I think that kind of partnership, however, is the one that we are
modeled in the Bible (see the Corinthians giving to the Jerusalem
church, for example), and is one that ultimately shows love and trust
for each other in ways that the 'self' model misses.
Self-sustainability is not a realistic goal; even self-propagation is
almost impossible to contemplate. I think we need to abandon that
thinking and instead look for a servant-partnership role for overseas
missions. I think we have a responsibility to continue to be involved
and supportive to the same levels that we were before, even if we are
not 'in charge' in places like Mukinge anymore. I hope that people
haven't chosen to leave places like Mukinge because that was too hard --
a statement something like 'if I can't be in charge of my things, then I
think I'll just take them and go somewhere where I can'. I don't think
that was the case in the past, but the fact remains that Mukinge (and
many other places like it) have been slowly abandoned by their brothers
and sisters in the West.